Presidential palace still fails to understand the situation in Papua

General SBY - Military approach will not solve Papua's problems

Bintang Papua, 19 February, 2012Manokwari: The holding of constructive dialogue or communications between Jakarta and Papua as mentioned by President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY) is regarded in some circles as being part of the solution to the problems occurring in Papua.In the opinion of Mervin Komber, a Papuan member of the DPR, the Indonesian Parliament, such a dialogue should take its cue from the road map for Papua, and lead to better living conditions for the  Papuan people. According to Komber, in order to achieve this, the agenda for such a dialogue should reflect the actual conditions currently confronted by the  Papuan  people.

With regard to the leaders who should be invited to participate in such a dialogue, they should be  people with the ability to deal with all aspects of the situation, including governance, parliament, customary groups, spiritual leaders as well as including people from the ranks for ordinary Papuans who enjoy the confidence of their respective groups.

‘All of us  who are in favour of dialogue must seek to achieve something positive for Papua,’ he said in Manokwari recently.

While he supports dialogue, Komber is critical of recent steps taken by SBY in his attempts to work out the best format  for the dialogue. In his opinion, the President’s decision to ask Papuan religious leaders  for their opinion  about the format and the agenda for this dialogue was a mistake. Komber believes that the religious leaders will themselves be  part of the dialogue, which means that the President should not have discussions with them about the format of the dialogue. But the President should summon provincial and local leadeers such as members of the DPRD, the DPD and academia to get their views on the format.

Moreover, if  only some elements are asked to discuss the format, he fears that this could result in misunderstandings as a result of the various inputs received by SBY. ‘If there are disagreements between some of these leaders, the people around SBY might end up passing on erroneous information about the situation in Papua,’  said Komber  who is a former activist from the Catholic students organisation, PMKRI.

The same might also occur with regard to the final objective of the dialogue, according to Felix Wanggai, a special staff member [not clear what staff this refers to] who looks forward to seeing Papua become a zone of peace. In his opinion, this may mean that the  people at the presidential palace do not properly understand  what it is that the Papuan people want. ‘The dialogue we have in mind is only intended to accelerate development in Papue,’ he said.

Jakarta has still not take any decision about when this dialogue or constructive communication should take place. According to Komber, the Jakarta-Papua dialogue is very urgent indeed and SBY should not postpone it. He went on to say that the dialogue is closely related to the implementation of special autonomy, OTSUS which was enacted eleven years ago. This means, in his opinion, that this dialogue should take place some time before the end of 2012.

‘I very much hope  that it will take place during the course of this year because OTSUS will remain in force for only another ten years, whereas the dialogue should occur while OTSUS remains in force.’

Finally he said that as far as he is concerned, the venue of the dialogue is not  a problem . The crucial thing is that the dialogue should be inspired by the determination to achieve a long term solution for Papua. ‘The dialogue could be held in ways that accord with Papuan traditions, such as those used by customary groups, sitting in their honai, or other such places,’  this young legislator said in conclusion.

[Translated by TAPOL]

One thought on “Presidential palace still fails to understand the situation in Papua

Add yours

  1. Agree with Mr. Kombe’s opinions and views expressed relates to the best format for dialoque being searched by the Indonesian President (SBY) for a a dialoque or communications with people of Papua in order to solve issues in Papua.

    SBY should not chart out any format for dialoque without involving many Papuan leaders in Papua and West Papua.

    For this purpose,I should define as to who are the West Papuan leaders that are needed to be involved in the dialoque. The leaders needed are West papuans academics from different professions (Law, politics and other academic fields, Religious leaders with higher academic qualifications, Administrators with higher academic qualifications, traditional/customary leaders, and other professional and community groupings. These people must be agrreed by the rest of the members of West papuan communities as their genuine representatives.

    President SBY and his national government should show their genuiness in this search for format for dialoque and it quest for the genuine solution to the Political problems and issue in West Papua and Papua provinces by laying open all their cards.

    They should not engage in dialoque with only one section of West Papuan leaders, They should not involve in propaganda that they have met with West papuan independence leaders or whatsoever leaders as we know Indonesian Government as well as its Military and/or armed forces of their long tradition of mainipulative discourse.

    What Papuan people need now is open internationally mediated dialoque between Indonesian national government and the OPM who have long represented West papuan People’s Ideals for independence. This is the view and/or action that if taken should indicate the genuinness on the part of Indonesia to solve the political issue in papua.

    If SBY and his government do not open up to take such approach or search that was even resolved and recommended by a meeting of papuan leaders and Indonesian officials a year or two ago led by Fr.Neles Tebay then its current search for format for dialoque or communications with papuan people can be deemed as another one of those old manipulative political discourses that is being employed by national government to eliminate Papuan peoples political aspirations for re-conducting referendum that should be conducted free of intimidation, internationally supervised and conducted according to the international system of voting practice.

Please leave a comment. Keep it nice to other users, and remember, no disrepect tolerated. Yell at the killers, not each other; Criticise the abusers deed, not their race or faith.. And please keep it relevant and punchy.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: